This is one of the important concept
of number system .Questions on remainders and factor are quite frequent in CAT these days . Lets see the divisibility rule of few numbers.
We all perhaps know what is the
divisibility rule of 2,4,6,8,3,9 .But do everyone know the logic behind it
?
First
case :
Let me start from divisibility of 2
If last digit is divisible by 2 ,
then it is divisible by 2 ...
why ?
why ?
Last digit is nothing but divide by
10 ...10 is perfectly divisible by 2..
Now we can extend this for 4
..
lets take last digit --> divide by 10 --> 10 /4 --> Not perfectly divisible
lets take last digit --> divide by 10 --> 10 /4 --> Not perfectly divisible
Now move to next digit--> divide
by 100
100 is perfectly divisible by 4 .. So divisibility rule of 4 is last two digits to be divisible by 4
100 is perfectly divisible by 4 .. So divisibility rule of 4 is last two digits to be divisible by 4
Now this goes on ... jus try for
various numbers like 8 ,16,32
the above logic works for factor of 10^n like powers of 2 and 5 . Other numbers can't be treated this way
the above logic works for factor of 10^n like powers of 2 and 5 . Other numbers can't be treated this way
Second
case
Lets take an example of next number ..
take 3
10/3 --> not divisible
100/3 --> not divisible
1000/3 --> not divisible and it goes on ..
But in all three cases , the remainder is 1 .
10/3 --> not divisible
100/3 --> not divisible
1000/3 --> not divisible and it goes on ..
But in all three cases , the remainder is 1 .
If remainder is 1 , add the digits
Divisibility rule of 3 will add the
digits and then check if its divisible by 3 . This is applicable for numbers which leaves
remainder 1 when 10^n is divided by that number
Quick
divisibility rule :
Take 33 :
100/33 leaves remainder 1 . So one
can frame divisibility rule of 33 as sum of digits taken two at a time from the
right hand side of number .
Eg . Is 2112 divisible by 33 ?
12 + 21 = 33 . 33/33 perfectly
divisible . Yes .. isn’t that easy ?
Third case :
Lets take an example of next number .. take 7
10/7 --> not divisible but remainder is not 0 or 1 or -1
100/7 --> not divisible but remainder is not 0 or 1 or -1
1000/7 --> not divisible but remainder is -1
so every three digit we will have -1 remainder ..
if 10^3 has -1 remainder , 10^6 has 1 as remainder...
so its alternative in nature for every three digits .
Lets take an example of next number .. take 7
10/7 --> not divisible but remainder is not 0 or 1 or -1
100/7 --> not divisible but remainder is not 0 or 1 or -1
1000/7 --> not divisible but remainder is -1
so every three digit we will have -1 remainder ..
if 10^3 has -1 remainder , 10^6 has 1 as remainder...
so its alternative in nature for every three digits .
Divisibility rule of 7 will difference of sum of the digits taken at three at a time
alternatively from RHS of the number and
then check if this resultant divisible by 7
say number is 123130 to check for divisibility by 7 .,..
so according to this concept we have , 130 - 123= 7 which is divisible by 7
say number is 123130 to check for divisibility by 7 .,..
so according to this concept we have , 130 - 123= 7 which is divisible by 7
Or let’s say 7123130 -- > (130 + 7) – 123 = 14 which is
divisible by 7
The beauty of this method is it works well for big number divisors (for instance- 143) .
The beauty of this method is it works well for big number divisors (for instance- 143) .
235378/143 .. is it divisible ?
10^3 / 143 = remainder is -1
By this method ,we can say 378 - 235 = 143.. 143 / 143 is perfectly divisible .That's all you r done
Applying this formula , we can test divisibility of 2,3,4,5,7,8,9,11,27,13,33,37,99,77,143,259(37*7) etc ....
Just work on these lines .. You can easily find the divisibility of all above numbers
By this method ,we can say 378 - 235 = 143.. 143 / 143 is perfectly divisible .That's all you r done
Applying this formula , we can test divisibility of 2,3,4,5,7,8,9,11,27,13,33,37,99,77,143,259(37*7) etc ....
Just work on these lines .. You can easily find the divisibility of all above numbers
Ps : Feel free to revert me back in comments if you have any doubts .
hey great initiative... will be following this one closely... will get back to you with my queries.. keep posting ...cheers
ReplyDeleteAwesome article sir, pls keep up the great work !!!
ReplyDeleteGreat.
ReplyDeletevery good logic
ReplyDeleteThanks for enlightening us about the logic behind the divisibility rules
ReplyDeletesir you did not explain about divisibility rule of 11.
ReplyDelete